Bond Solon Reviews

very positive experience

• Reasonable Accommodations not made for my disability. I asked for training materials before hand and a manual was provided. The presenter also used a selection of slides. When I asked him to share them he said no. I asked again but he would not and I was not comfortable explaining why a printed copy would help my disability. • Providing some incorrect information and not willing to be politely challenged / asked about it: o For example, when explaining the Dunning Kruger principle he then explained imposter syndrome as the opposite. This is something I am quite interested in so I put my hand up and tried to explain that this principle covers imposter syndrome as well. However, before I could finish my first sentence, he cut me off and spoke over me loudly stating that I was wrong. I tried to speak again, and he did the same. o The perjury Act. He had an explanation in his slide which wasn’t entirely correct. I do not fully understand why but another delegate with a law degree explained to me that his explanation was wrong and potentially spreading legal misinformation. • Avoided answering questions he did not know the answer to. For example, I asked him what a solicitor might say in our interviews because they are civil not criminal. He responded giving criminal examples. He then asked if that answered my question and I explained that those examples did not apply to us and he agreed. He then screenshared the criminal legislation about solicitors provided in the manual and talked through that. o It would have been fine for him to say I don’t know, but he didn’t. • Did not consider that we are not criminal prosecutors / the police, for example: o Heavily referred to criminal law even when asked “how would this apply to us” o Used language such as “the suspect”, “pass it to a decision maker” (we make the initial decisions with cases”, and when you are “gathering evidence”. This would have been fine if he then gave an example relevant to us. • Training materials included some irrelevant material to us, such as No Comment interviews, and Solicitors rights. In particular we spent 20 minutes of the course explaining how to use teams for an interview which would not require an expert training session and did not feel like the best use of our time. Overall the presenter was very knowledgeable, but was not comfortable answering difficult questions (he is clearly an expert on criminal side but does not have reasonable knowledge about civil), and had a tendency to interrupt / speak over multiple delegates. The course materials were well structured and informative but included a large amount of less relevant material.

Great course and great trainer.

Really enjoyed the course - very informative and really interesting/helpful being cross examined.

Engaging, well paced, good mix of input and interactive, great examples

Altohough not totally relevant to my role, the trainer tried their best to adopt it to my role

Very informative, thank you

Very good and informative and relevant to my role.

Great teaching session, very informative. It was enjoyable , relevant and important session.

It would have been a boring subject if it was a different trainer but Jamie made it entertaining, answered questions well, kept us engaged. I would like to apologise for my colleague becoming heated in discussion. Please understand it is not personally intended but a frustration to the policies/"arse covering" involved in nursing