Found it all very interesting but I think it was more aimed towards psu/investigations than from a vetting standpoint that’s my only comment but I think it could easily be made relevant for the vetting audience.

Helpful review? Yes No

[ Inappropriate review ]

Alison H, 13 Jul 2026

A lot of initial powerpoint but content useful and case studies provoked good discussion. Would like to have it expanded upon with specific agency input/processes

Helpful review? Yes No

[ Inappropriate review ]

Aruni S, 10 Jul 2026

well worth attending some of the discussion/refresher was diluted by digressing from topic course like this should be regimented - start with concepts of liability (did but digressed), clarify CPR part 35, discuss basics of examination, basic structure of a personal injury report, mention some good / bad reports, dishonesty. Some participants were ill informed about their role as "expert". could have benefitted more if focussed.

Helpful review? Yes No

[ Inappropriate review ]

Kari-Anne H, 09 Jul 2026

I have learnt a lot more about the different legislations. It was a good mixture of interaction and learning from slides. This allowed a deeper understanding and to maintain concentration more easily. It was useful to have examples of good notices. Good amount of breaks. Some questions needed more time whilst others needed less e.g. less time writing notes about lunch break.

Helpful review? Yes No

[ Inappropriate review ]

Ian W, 09 Jul 2026

Enjoyed the course. Good content and pace

Helpful review? Yes No

[ Inappropriate review ]