Technique Training Ltd Reviews

Wendy is an exceptional Tutor who engages very successfully with her students and understands their individual needs in terms of knowledge. Her enthusiasm is infectious, i Have attended both the 18th Edition and 2391 courses with Wendy achieving marks in excess of 90%, due no doubt to Wendy

Overall I found the course very challenging. The ladder logic was difficult for the first week, but I started to grasp it later in the second week. The instructor was very knowledgeable, so far as finding it difficult that has to be down to my aptitude level. The facilities are very good with lunch thrown in as an added bonus. Thank you.

The course was beneficial and I found it informative. Dawn was really good at teaching the subject and dumbing difficult information down so you understood the fundamentals before then explaining in book terminology. Some of the equipment we were working on was damaged and faulty eg we would wire our panels and test our boards but there would always be a faulty contactor, motor board, relay etc. However, the tools and toolboxes provided were very good. The dinners were a lot better than expected. I found the environment very laid back and there was no pressure on you to rush your boards etc which was good. I do feel that the course could’ve been completed in half the time, but overall I was very happy with the course and will recommend to my colleagues.

A good course with very supportive tutor, gave real life example's and also broke the course down in what can be a very heavy subject!

very well run course with exceptional knowledge from the tutor.

Less people in the class would enable the tutor to give more attention to individuals. I feel the class was too big for the intensity of the subject complexity.

the tutor wendy was great ! given we only had 2 days to cover the regs book I thought she managed to cover everything without skipping through sections too quickly.

Competent tutor and excellent venue and facilities. My only negative observations are: 1. Too short. 50 hours guidance and 17 hours assessment time is the recommended amount for 2391:52 and we had to complete both in 5 X 6 hour days (30 hours). 2. It would have helped to spend 15 minutes in the classroom to be shown how to use the supplied test equipment in advance of the practical exercises.

*from a venue point of view. Babies crying next door is quite distracting. *the classroom was well ventilated but at the cost of getting quite cold. *would have liked more fault diagnoses and interrogation instruction. hands tied by ELCAS and work commitments with regards to that though. *a good foundation level and appreciation of PLCs, would like to do more with this subject.

Tutor was Pete. Very enlightening course.