ACI Learning Reviews

After attending several other courses with LeaderQuest only via online instruction, I can say that this course was by far the most disappointing. The instructor did not seem prepared from day one through the end of the course. A manual review should be in order. I became aware that Mr. Hill may have several certifications within the industry and degrees through traditional learning institutions however, his expertise as a student was not evident as a teacher. Reading the slides to grown adults is not teaching. As a former instructor I would've excoriated for this lack of preparation and delivery. I have no doubts that LeaderQuest values it's reputation, thus if Mr. Tim Hill is going to remain with LeaderQuest I firmly believe an intervention counseling is essential. To my knowledge and his credit, Mr. Hill has done nothing illegal, immoral or unethical.

need additional time perhaps in the form of an additional week in order to ensure a check on knowledge to ensure students understand coming from no it in my background the time constraint is what failed me in learning the net+ objectives. a prep material packet before the course will ensure success set up for failure

would prefer shorter time on zoom

LeaderQuest provides many learning resources which will undoubtedly allow me to pass the certification. In this particular time through this course, I did NOT leave the course with a strong foundation nor an understanding of where I was lacking.

Again, and additional 2 or 3 days to allow more time for review and examples would be perfect. The test out labs are a poor substitute for in person/hands on instruction.

I was expecting more details around actual auditing of cybersecurity - how to do it. The last 30 slides gave a 'checklist' of what documents to review. But going into more details, like what to look for, would have been helpful.

I had higher expectations. I did walk away with as an assessor, to pull more threads.

None.

As I mentioned, majority of the materials were irrelevant to what I needed.

The course didn't seem geared toward in-charge auditors. There wasn't enough teaching of concepts an in-charge auditor could use. There were too many stories many of which didn't really apply.