Showing 171–180 of 430 reviews (4 star)
Dynamic tutors, interesting course materials, pleasant to work in group about a real-life topic
15 minutes break time on the morning and afternoon and 1h30 for lunch instead of 1 hour would be better
One week is more than enough to cover all the materials, no need for a second week. Rasna is one of the best trainers we've ever had, she gave us some really beneficial tips. JP and Lauren were really kind and extremely diligent throughout the course.
Interesting training, very useful on various aspects (corporate finance, accounting, valuation, modelling). Very much recommended!
Very interesting lessons. I liked we came back to the fundamentals of Corporate Finance as I am not working in M&A and many things were not that clear to me. Good interactions with the teacher that kept the course very structured and on time while covering a broad range of topics. The drill exercises were really good to practice as well. Working in Project Finance, I would have enjoyed if we covered more cash analysis or debt structuring but we still saw some basics. Lots of tricks that i will try to apply in my current position.
The course was great altough quite focused on M&A skills. Probably a more diversified list of topics would have been appreciatted. The format of 1.30h sessions is great but less courses during the 2 weeks would have been great to enjoy more what the Chateauforme has to offer and have more team bulding and networking among us. Overall, I enjoyed this training and it enables me to meet great people and start building netwotk, I would definitely recommend do it again for next juniors.
It was really interesting and helpful. It would be good to spend more time on shortcut and how to optimize time on the model and also on Info Memorandum
Trainer is always happy to answer questions and is really helpful with his advice. The sessions go at a good pace with both group and independent practice.
Serge Vidal is a great instructor. He is open and friendly, so it is easy to rely on him as a resource and gain a better understanding of the material. He is very experienced and helpful, being able to correct mistakes in a model quickly. Sometimes, however, the material is lacking. The wording is sometimes off. The exams feel a bit contrived. We are not always tested on what we learn.