Clinical Leadership in Safeguarding Reviews

Sue has a profound knowledge of the subject and her passion for improving practice was infectious. The study materials were excellent. It came highly recommended and I can see why. It's fascinating to hear from a lawyer about the legal basis and practicalities of safeguarding. The highlight for me was relating it all back to first principles of human rights law.

Relevant but not quite appropriate for private providers

Fantastic course, so helpful for my job role. Day 1 was much more relevant to me as I wanted to understand legislation around my job which I now do. Sue was a fantastic trainer - very knowledgeable in her field and interesting to listen to. Thank you

The course was over 2 days and the second day related to evidence and court- of which I have a lot of experience, though it was interesting. As stated by others it would have been useful to have the training before going to court. The first day covered the legal framework for safeguarding- I am new to the named doctor role and as yet haven't had much experience with the role. I still need to do a lot of reading and improve my understanding of the laws/ acts governing safeguarding

really interesting course and Max was really engaging, allowing open discussion and questioning- no shaming! Really enjoyed the course, definitely increased my knowledge and confidence and feeling motivated thank you

brilliant course content and delivery it covered a lot

Created Engaging in depth discussions. Legalities clearly explained . Good opportunities to reflect on past/ current cases.

Enjoyed the discussions generated by the course content and the learning from other trusts processes

Absolutely brilliant course, would have loved to have an extra day just for discussions/questions and going over anything again. Trainer was excellent, very engaging and knowledgeable and able to answer questions and expanded on topics to give examples to bring it back to practice.

this course was interesting and the trainer was great at answering the qs of the group. however this did lead to the timetable being quite significantly adjusted. day 1 expanded heavily into d2 meaning there were only a few hours to discuss areas that were more relevant to my role eg the court etc stuff. we spent large amounts of time discussing MCA and DOLs, which was interesting but took more time than scheduled. it is a shame as i think it would have been useful to have discussed the d2 timetabled subjects in more detail.