Sort by:

AVM Services Reviews

Showing 4 star reviews : View all 1159 reviews

Scott B, 18 Oct 2019

Good teacher good course materials.
Response : Hi Scott, Thanks for your feedback. Look forward to meeting you again for the Porous Load autoclaves CP(D) quarterly course.

Helpful review?   Yes   No

[ Inappropriate review ]

Fraser I, 18 Oct 2019

Possibly due to lack of organisation and venue, I feel the practical sessions and assessments were incomplete and rushed. The PowerPoint was admittedly outdated. The trainer was professional and overcame problems. His knowledge was excellent.
Response : Hi Fraser, I agree that the practical sessions could have been better. For the amount of candidates, we really needed access to two W/D's and have two sets of functioning test equipment. Unfortunately, we didn't have either and we had to improvise. I take your point about the Powerpoint. That will be updated. I look forward to meeting you again in November.

Helpful review?   Yes   No

[ Inappropriate review ]

sevvel m, 04 Feb 2019

Ray Martin is a very experienced and knowledgeable trainer. Practical session was very useful .

Helpful review?   Yes   No

[ Inappropriate review ]

Gaven B, 17 Dec 2018

Leeds

The course is relevant to the Hospital Industry, the attendees were all from the Pharma Industry so the relevance was not fully aligned to my background and future usage. However it was interesting seeing a different viewpoint on the testing principles.
Response : Hi Gaven, Thanks for your feedback. We are keen to develop a course that has more relevance for the Pharma industry. I will be in contact once it is completed.

Helpful review?   Yes   No

[ Inappropriate review ]

Chris L, 06 Dec 2018

Leeds

Ray was fantastic all week, he's a great teacher with a fountain of knowledge will certainly be recommending him to our management when I return to work next week. 10 out of 10 for Ray in all areas one of the best course Lecturer I've ever had made the course fun and enjoyable along the way.

Helpful review?   Yes   No

[ Inappropriate review ]

helen s, 26 Oct 2018

there were two engineers and two from SSD so we all felt we would have benefitted more from the four day course as we were a different skill set of people and the condensed course was good we thought the four days would have been better for us.

Helpful review?   Yes   No

[ Inappropriate review ]

helen s, 18 Oct 2018

As we were two engineers and two SSD staff I felt we would have benefitted more from the four days two on each subject as the course was condensed to three days to cover washer/disinfectors and porous load sterilizers. Saying that it was very informative and the presentation was good, the training was also very knowledgeable and answered all our questions and queries.

Helpful review?   Yes   No

[ Inappropriate review ]

Michael D, 14 Sep 2018

The course was taught to a very high standard. It is refreshing to be trained by an engineer who is currently working within the industry and can give practical knowledge as well as theoretical. Thankfully, the trainer was able to provide all equipment required in order to carry out the course. The exam questions could use some improvement as some questions could have multiple answers. Having previously completed the Authorised Persons (Decontamination) course, I would suggest that potential AP(D)'s complete the periodic testing course beforehand. I feel that I have solidified my knowledge gained on the AP(D) course via the completion of this one. A rather backward momentum.

Helpful review?   Yes   No

[ Inappropriate review ]

Ricky G, 11 Aug 2018

Overall the course was good, I found Kieth to be very knowledgeable. The only criticism I have is that when it comes to the practical part of the course both the trainer and students should have knowledge about the machine they’re working on as this would enable things to run more smoothly.

Helpful review?   Yes   No

[ Inappropriate review ]

Barry E, 10 Aug 2018

Tutor was approachable, helpful and knowledgeable. My only criticisms are that the power point content could be better presented (repeats in places). The other point is that the final exam had a couple of questions that you could argue had multiple answers that would be correct.

Helpful review?   Yes   No

[ Inappropriate review ]