Happy reviews

4.7 (28,945 reviews)
AI summary of reviews

Happy’s distinctive strength is its consistently warm, patient trainers, who create inclusive, non-judgemental spaces where attendees feel comfortable asking questions, reflecting and contributing. Across its courses, attendees describe delivery as clear, well paced and engaging, with a strong balance of discussion, theory and hands-on practice. They value practical tools, useful resources and examples they can apply immediately, alongside clear joining information and prompt course materials.

Engaging trainersPractical learningSupportive environment

Generated from recent reviews; may not reflect every review

Showing 9,231–9,240 of 29,174 reviews

Sort by
“

Was very good to reflect on other peoples preferences towards resilience and what skills they have implemented into their routine

Daniel M · 12 Jan 2023
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review
“

Pace was fine, enough time for discussion.

Diana C · 12 Jan 2023
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review
“

Not enough time spent introducing big ideas by the facilitators, thankfully I already had an introduction to them through my learning. Not enough time dedicated to discussions in break out rooms.

Susie H · 12 Jan 2023
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review
“

There is a still a lot of content to process in one session and I feel as though I can't really engage enough with the content. I wonder if I might be having more trouble with the course being online than I had initially thought. I have also been reflecting on the use of models. I'm struggling with the volume of models being introduced and whether or not I will realistically use them. This is probably more of a general comment on models and tools in leadership and what I feel about their value... I suppose I am most interested with the thinking around them and how this challenges/changes my own thinking. I have noticed (and perhaps incorrectly) that there is a general lack of diversity in the content we are studying. To the best of my knowledge, I think we have predominantly been looking at models and ways of thinking from white CIS males - with the exception of Michael. C. Bush and Amy Edmondson. Although, it may be that I have gotten this wrong.

Lucy W · 12 Jan 2023
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review
“

Jo is great -- she creates such a warm and safe environment for everyone to learn in, listens to everyone's questions and comments and adapts what she is delivering accordingly.

Helen H · 11 Jan 2023
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review
“

A very productive and informative session. Great involvement of all due to good facilitation. Stories helped embed theory eg examples from Happy

Alison G · 11 Jan 2023
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review
“

Excellent and thought provoking training. Enjoyed sessions on the power of purpose and strengths.

Karen B · 11 Jan 2023
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review
“

Lots of really useful varied topics throughout the session today.

Emma T · 11 Jan 2023
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review
“

enjoyable day. Confidence is growing

Pauline S · 11 Jan 2023
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review
“

Good trainer

Wayne L · 11 Jan 2023
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review