Reed Learning Reviews

The trainer was good at providing opportunity to answer questions, they managed interruptions well, and were good at engaging people. The introductions felt a bit lengthy, but we had more than enough time. And worked well at getting people involved. I won't know how good the content is about addressing objectives until I start the assignment. Breaks were plenty and well-timed.

In other courses I found jam boards really useful. I didn’t really feel I came away confident with the content sorry 🫣 possibly need more examples

Great workshop

Just issues with papers/guidance being different to Fiona’s.

Fiona was great as always, it was a bit confusing as the assessment guidance was different for her and us but nothing that she could help.

Ah it was good. There were issues with the vle content but it was swiftly cleared up. No complaints

I felt the old assessment guidance which had a table would have been much more helpful in helping us understand on how to present. Also there was a bit of difference between the two different assessment guidelines that are on the vle which caused confusion. However, Fiona was helpful with the information that she provided to give us structure in our approach.

Please can the assessment report match the training.

Number of issues with this one. Firstly, the VLE states the deadline for submission as 1st October and we didn’t have the first workshop until 2 October. Link not sent until l support chased. Not for the first time the workshop tutor had different indicative content to that on my VLE and this time Fiona had a different question to us for 3.2 ( apart from one group member). As a group we don’t mind which question we answer, but need to feel sure the Assessor is marking against the right indicative content to our question. Fiona did adapt the session to leave out breakout groups as several members busy and appreciated that it was confusing for us.

Very interesting