Technique Training Ltd Reviews

Nice tutor, very friendly

I would to say thank you to Wendy, for her fantastic approach to teaching, i will be recommending Technique to friends and co-workers.

Very good experience overall, this is a difficult course and is not easy to get through, students who struggle or do not pass should most likely need a good foundation of electrical knowledge and experience as some parts of the course are challenging. Keith has a great knowledge and experience of the industry and was able to break the course down to help us through the course. I would recommend this Centre to any potential students and will be looking to come back to do my EV installations course when available.

Allan was very supportive and really helpful taking time to explain things I wasn't understanding in detail/different way. No lunch provided for the 4weeks I was on the TEC20 Cse and not informed.

Course should only be advertised for experienced electricians. Knowledge of three phase and 18th edition is not enough. For people with less extensive electrical background, a two week course length would greatly improve it and enhance the ability of students to pass. Nowhere near enough information was provided by Learn Techniques about the details and make up of the course. Having access to a reading list beforehand and online mock tests would have greatly benefited.

lunch was not provided and we were not told till we arrived computer also stalled in the middle of final exam costing some time

It is very well organized

I thing the course is bi Advanced for non Electricians. For the Engineers need some bridge course to can catch up. For me was just right course because I am an Electrician but my colleagues was struggling.

Why not 5 stars overall? I found your course on the net, advertised as a Siemens S7/300 one. Unfortunately the exam project (and vast majority of the course) I did on S7/200. Why? There were 6 students in the classroom and some were working on Allen-Bradley and some on Siemens. That was the last day when the tutor declared there would be no problem to sit me down on S7/300 straightaway from the first day. Please don't take it as claim, please consider the above as my honest course rating, as I do it as requested. Still I consider everything be very useful. Why not 5 stars to the Tutor? Why not 5 stars to the materials? That's because engineering (and science) is a domain of high precision when expressing statements. And programmer is such an engineer who once makes an error, the whole of his project stops working. Therefore I cannot overlook some of technical inaccuracies among drawings, statements, and questions (we discussed them with the Tutor), that could be found in both printed materials and examination questions. What matter you don't yet bring up here? That's the overall course value, be understood as a ratio of what I take away to what I put in. In other words, how much I gain for the money size. (As I pay for myself) None can say "excellent" at this point because we all wish to spend as little as can be or maybe nothing. What I can say, I take away right what what I expected (this is some experience on S7 and City&Guilds certificate) for the money I paid upfront - considering what the market offers. I hope the above elaboration can be found honest of mine and useful of Yours, With my best regards Leszek Korona

Was very intuitive and interactive