Good Laboratory Practice (QMS ISO 17025:2017) reviews

4.8 (122 reviews)
AI summary of reviews

Attendees value the trainers’ strong knowledge of ISO 17025 and quality management, with text-heavy material made accessible through relevant laboratory examples, clear explanations and practical procedures. They describe sessions as interactive and well paced, with questions welcomed, group discussion encouraged and delivery adapted to participants’ requirements. The engaging, approachable teaching helps them understand the standard, improve lab compliance and apply learning confidently in their current and future roles.

Expert trainersRelevant examplesInteractive delivery

Generated from recent reviews; may not reflect every review

Showing 1–10 of 124 reviews

Sort by

It’s very good to get iso knowledge related to quality management

Muazam I · 10 Feb 2026
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review

Annmarie was a great tutor. Difficult to deliver when it is quite text heavy but was delivered well and she had good relevant examples.

Cathal G · 30 Sep 2025
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review

Great class, everything was broken down into real examples

Matthew C · 22 Sep 2025
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review

Very good

Stephen V · 22 Sep 2025
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review

Anne Marie Newell was very professional. I found this course very beneficial lots of important information.

Magdalena P · 22 Sep 2025
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review

Very professional and thorough course I learnt many valuable procedures and ways to reframe my thinking

Shaun M · 10 Jun 2025
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review

Great Content. Tutor had great knowledge and very helpful.

Stephen R · 08 Apr 2025
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review

Very interesting course. And very well presented

Brian K · 09 Jan 2025
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review

Good class, I got more knowledge from the teacher,

Riya’s W · 09 Jan 2025
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review

Overall very interesting and informative. It was delivered very well and any questions we had or confusion were clarified.

Amanda G · 29 Nov 2024
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review